In a study conducted by researchers at Yale University, it has been discovered that our brains exhibit significantly greater activity during in-person conversations compared to online interactions via platforms like Zoom. This finding underscores the vital role of face-to-face communication and dynamic facial cues in human social interactions.
The study, led by Joy Hirsch, a professor of comparative medicine and neuroscience, and published in the journal Imaging Neuroscience, sheds light on how our brains respond differently in real-life conversations and virtual interactions. Hirsch's team used advanced neuroimaging technologies to record neural response signals during live, two-person interactions and Zoom video calls.
The most striking observation from the study was the substantial suppression of brain activity during online interactions, particularly on Zoom. It appears that our brains are finely tuned to process the dynamic facial cues that are an integral part of real in-person encounters. Hirsch noted that Zoom, in comparison, seems to be an "impoverished social communication system" relative to in-person interactions.
When people engaged in face-to-face conversations, their brain activity showed increased neural signalling, extended gaze time, and pupil dilation. These physiological responses indicated heightened arousal and enhanced face-processing abilities, making in-person interactions a richer and more dynamic experience.
Additionally, the study found that there was more coordinated neural activity between the brains of individuals conversing in person. This suggests that there is a more pronounced exchange of social cues and a higher level of reciprocity in face-to-face interactions.
Hirsch emphasized the significance of spontaneous and natural social interactions that occur during in-person encounters. The study's results underscore the role of face-to-face communication in our natural social behaviours.
She explained, "Online representations of faces, at least with current technology, do not have the same 'privileged access' to social neural circuitry in the brain that is typical of the real thing." This indicates that while technology has enabled virtual communication, it does not fully replicate the richness of in-person interactions in terms of brain activity and social cues.